“it is the messy
complexity of human experience that leads researchers to case studies in the
qualitative or interpretive tradition” (3)
“an object (or person) does not have a fixed meaning” (5)
While I was reading On The Case and came across those two
quotes I was thinking about several things in the background. I think I’ve been
something like a case studier for a while without knowing it. I remember it
happening in middle school, I would people watch a lot. In the middle of class
id be looking around wondering what other people were thinking about.
Especially if they were paying attention to class. I would usually come to the
conclusion that I had A.D.D or something was wrong with me because everyone else
was paying attention to class, and I was paying attention to them, and trying
to imagine what they could be thinking about it. I still do it now, I wonder what
it’s like thinking in a different pattern, other than my own. Then when I went
to UTSA I took a philosophy of language class and we talked about a philosopher
( ill go look up his name later) who spoke about quasi-communication. He said
the reality of the world was that we can never know someone’s mind, what they’re
thinking and what meaning is to them. That the truth was, we were indeed all
alone, in our minds, because the closest thing we could do to share our mind was
considered quasi-communication. Unless I could implant what was in my mind into
yours, you will never know what anything means to me.
I remember thinking
that means everything is pointless, because nobody knows anything about
anything and we can’t share anything about anything, because everything means
something different to everyone. “an object (or person) does not have a fixed
meaning” (5)
It reminds me of the first time I learn what the word
purpose meant. I was in pre-k and we
were playing simon says. And simon had said to lay on your side and kick your
feet like your swimming. So I did, and my best little friend Jessica was behind
me and I kicked her in the face. She
started crying, everyone stopped, and my teacher grabbed me in that perfectly
soft spot by your elbow were it stings when it’s pinched. She took me to the
side and situated me in front of her, but didn’t bend down so I had to look up
to her. She asked me “Did you do that on purpose or on accident?” I was an only child and had, at that point,
never accidently or purposely done anything as far as I knew. So in my head I did
ennie-minnie-minni-moe in order to choose my fate. I landed on purpose.
So I told my teacher I did it on purpose.
The word purpose for me means lots of things. And every
time I hear that word I think about kicking Jessica in the face, being dragged
off by my elbow by my teacher, and having to chose a word for my actions. I had
to choose a meaning for what I did, and my meaning, what I was experiencing, didn’t
have words to match with the outside worlds meaning. The way my teacher had asked
me, as if the word purpose and accident was something that everyone should have
already known, scared me out of asking what those words meant. Because she made
me feel like those words were solid, but they weren’t to me. So I just chose
one randomly to stop the questions and to go wallow in the guilt of kicking my
best friend in the face. After that I wondered if I had done it on purpose
without knowing it, since that’s the word I landed on when I was debating in my
head.
Sometimes I get tripped up on meaning making and what things
mean to people. I often find myself coming back to this quote from 1984 by George
Orwell “He wondered, as he had many times wondered before, whether he himself
was a lunatic. Perhaps a lunatic was simply a minority of one”. Everything does
mean something different to everyone and maybe I will never know anything about
anything. But I still find myself trying to understand.
“Through collecting observations, talking with other people,
and collecting artifacts, case study researchers aim to enter into other people’s
‘imaginative universes’. That is, they aim to construct interpretations of
other people’s interpretations- of others’ ‘real worlds’” (18)
That was a great interpretation of what Dyson and Genishi were trying to explain with the complications finding meaning or "purpose" in peoples' actions during research (I laughed out loud when reading about how you "accidentally" or "purposely" kicked Jessica in the face).
ReplyDeleteYour story and the first chapter in this book remind me of the idea of how perception takes apart in constructing meaning from varying texts. In my literature classes at UTSA, I learned that the meaning of an author's work is derived from two perceptions - the writer and the reader. This idea explains how meaning is created when a book is published and read.
Because reading is obviously an action done by a participant in a social activity, this book, and your anecdote, help me to ask the right questions when analyzing "purpose": How does one create or perceive meaning from not only observing an action, but also by participating? I will always ask this question in my future research.