Mixed
methods procedures involve four important aspects: timing, weighting, mixing
and theorizing. Creswell discusses how proposal developers should consider the
timing of their qualitative and quantitative data collection. Researchers will
then need to decide whether the data will be collected sequentially (phases) or
concurrently (simultaneous). Researchers who collect data in phases can collect
either quantitative or qualitative first, while researchers who collect data
concurrently gather quantitative and qualitative data at the same time.
If I was to use a
mixed methods approach to my proposal, I would use the phase approach. I enjoy
doing research like reading, one page or stage at a time. For example, my
proposal includes interviewing people and asking questions about their
identity. For each person, I would need to separate the interviews using a “phase-like”
approach. I would collect data from each person and it would be difficult
logistically to gather the data at the same time.
Weighting
refers to how much of each type is used in your study. Creswell states that
when designing procedures, researchers should assess the weight or priority
given to quantitative or qualitative data used in the study. The two options
weighted include two types of approaches: the inductive or deductive
approaches. The inductive approach generates themes in qualitative while the
deductive approach tests a theory.
My proposal on how
individuals achieve identity would probably use a more inductive approach. My
goal is to search for common themes while assessing a theory on how characters
from novels carry traits from Marcia’s theory of identity. This process will
help me weigh between both perspectives (qualitative and quantitative) in order
to get my point across. For example, adolescent development is both a
scientific and creative study, which bridges science and art. When I write my
proposal I will weigh both sides in data collection.
Mixing of the data is considered to
be difficult, and Creswell asks how mixing occurs. The translating of data into
a coherent research proposal is challenging when using numerous sources such
as: text, images, quantitative data and numbers. The mixing can occur at any
stage, as the researcher needs to acknowledge both aspects continuously. This
is perhaps the most difficult stage for researchers.
My proposal will
mix the data in stages, more like the phase approach discussed earlier. I will
use interviews and text in an attempt to better understand how adolescents and
even adults’ identities change or evolve over time. I will introduce the theory
first and then let the literature take it from there, acknowledging the
differences and similarities of each aspect.
The final factor to consider is
whether a larger, theoretical perspective guides the research (Creswell). The uses
of explicit theories are often found in the beginning of the project. Explicit
theories help guide the audience, or reader, in understanding the project.
Creswell stipulates that explicit perspectives help the audience to form a “lens”
and see through the researchers’ perspective.
My proposal will make
use of Marcia’s theoretical lens when it comes to identity development. The
four different perspectives include identity diffusion, foreclosure,
moratorium, and achievement. I want my audience to understand the following
literature in my project. The use of a lens will help them to share my
perspective.
No comments:
Post a Comment