When beginning to read Research
Design, I felt like the material clarified, filled in gaps, and gave names
to research processes I have done in the past. I felt most familiar with the qualitative
material, which made sense since I have never really been in a field which does
quantitative research. Even though I was more familiar, I have never done
research on “live human subjects” and it was hard to picture myself doing some
of these methods with no concrete frame of reference. I anticipate that some of
these ideas and processes will make a lot more sense when I begin to draft a
research proposal.
The readings for this week focused on the introductory material
and the purpose statement and research question being asked. The idea that
qualitative questions are “exploratory” came up once again and the importance
of being narrow in the focus of the research was emphasized. I thought the
examples of actual studies were helpful to read. It was enlightening to see how
long the introductions actually are – I thought the introductions I did for
other papers were too long, but they are nothing compared to what is expected
here. Of course, you need to cover so many things in the introduction, according
to this book, it has to be long.
There was one part of the section which said something like
it was necessary to include almost a dozen sources within the first page; this
was one part I found hard to imagine. To me, it sounds like simply listing, or name
dropping. How could you possibly discuss (even a little) that many sources in
One page? The part where the author mentioned making broad assertions about the
literature based on a chart of the research seemed to make more sense than
listing every single one of the authors that you might anticipate using in a
lengthy paper.
The next section was dealing with the purpose statement
which is differentiated from the research question in that it “sets forth the
intent of the study, not the problem or issue leading to a need for the study”
(111). I think once I start writing, the
templates offered here will be very useful. For a research question, having
just one central question was emphasized again for qualitative studies (which I
focused on, thinking this is probably what I will do in my research) with the addition
of sub-questions relating to the main question. By the end of this point in the
introduction, it seems the study will still be very broadly defined in terms of
theory and methods, but as much specificity as possible should be included,
like the participants, the site, and specific types of research like interviewing
or surveys.
I agree with you about the dozen resources with in the introduction. I too thought it was a bit much, but then again as I read through countless journals I find my self noticing how many authors incorporate resources into the 1st page of their intros.
ReplyDeleteAlthough these sections were very basic and elementary for building the foundation of a research proposal, I do see why it is extremely necessary to know about them. I have encountered many people who do not know the difference between mixed methods, qualitative, and quantitative.